Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic Silver 5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45: Comparison
Arctic Silver 5 and ID-Cooling Frost X45 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic Silver 5 at 8.9 W/mK, ID-Cooling Frost X45 at 15.2 W/mK, 41% in favour of ID-Cooling Frost X45. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic Silver | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Arctic Silver 5 | Frost X45 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.9 W/mK-41% | 15.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 3.5g syringe (also 12g) | 2g or 4g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-2 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs ID-Cooling Frost X45




