Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
- Model:
- Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
- Compound Type:
- Silicone-Based Pad
- Thermal Conductivity:
- 17 W/mK
- Electrical Conductivity:
- Non-Conductive
- Package Size:
- 100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets
- Recommended Use:
- High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling)
- Reapplication Interval:
- Long-term stable
- Safety Notes:
- None
Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Manufacturer: Fujipoly Last updated: September 10, 2026
Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK) Review
Fujipoly's a name that comes up constantly in console modding and GPU teardown circles, and Ultra Extreme XR-m is the reason why. At 17 W/mK it's the highest-rated non-conductive pad we carry, beating Gelid's own top pick.
Fujipoly's a name that comes up constantly in console modding and GPU teardown circles, and Ultra Extreme XR-m is the reason why. At 17 W/mK it's the highest-rated non-conductive pad we carry, beating Gelid's own top pick.
Thermal Performance and Conductivity
17 W/mK is the ceiling for non-conductive pads in this catalog, ahead of Gelid GP-Ultimate (15) and Thermalright Odyssey (12.8). Only the conductive carbon and graphene pads from Thermal Grizzly rate higher, and those come with a real safety tradeoff this doesn't.
Compound Type and Composition
Silicone-based, same safety profile as Gelid and Thermalright's offerings, just formulated to push conductivity higher.
Application and Consistency
Cut to size, place, mount, standard pad installation. Available in enough thickness options (0.5mm to 1.5mm) to fit most gaps without stacking.
Electrical Safety
Fully non-conductive. This is the appeal, Fujipoly-level conductivity without touching liquid metal or carbon-pad territory.
Longevity and Pump-Out Resistance
No reapplication needed, standard for pads. Once it's in, it's in.
Comparison to Sibling Products
Against Gelid GP-Ultimate, covered elsewhere on this site, Fujipoly wins outright on conductivity, the only real question is availability and price per sheet. Against Thermal Grizzly's conductive pads, Fujipoly trades roughly half the conductivity for full electrical safety, a trade most builds should actually take.
Who This Pad Is Actually For
Winner for: the best conductivity you can get without touching a conductive material.
GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling where you want the highest safe conductivity available.
Builders who want Thermal Grizzly-adjacent performance without the electrical risk.
Not for: Extreme builds where even 17 W/mK isn't enough, that's carbon/graphene pad territory.
Not for: Anyone on a tight budget, this typically costs more than Gelid or Thermalright's options.
Specifications
Identity and form
| Brand | Fujipoly |
|---|---|
| Model | Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m , Ultra Extreme XR-m |
Cure and durability
| Pump-Out Resistance | High |
|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad |
|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 17 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating |
| Package Size | 100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None |
| Paste Segment | Pad |
| Spec Score | 6.6 |
Expert Review
Reviewed by Burooj Alam. Rated by us, not by users.
Best for
- GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling where you want the highest safe conductivity available.
- Builders who want Thermal Grizzly-adjacent performance without the electrical risk.
Not for
- Extreme builds where even 17 W/mK isn't enough, that's carbon/graphene pad territory.
- Anyone on a tight budget, this typically costs more than Gelid or Thermalright's options.
FAQs
What are the key specifications of the Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)?
The Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK) is a thermal paste from Fujipoly. Key specs: Compound Type Silicone-Based Pad, Thermal Conductivity 17, Electrical Conductivity Non-Conductive, Package Size 100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness, Recommended Use High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling).
Will the Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK) work with my current setup?
The Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK) lists Thermal Conductivity is 17. Check that against the hardware you already own before buying, since this is the field that most often decides whether a part fits.
Who is the Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK) best suited to?
It suits gpu vram/vrm and console cooling where you want the highest safe conductivity available., builders who want thermal grizzly-adjacent performance without the electrical risk..
What are the drawbacks of the Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)?
It is a poor fit for extreme builds where even 17 w/mk isn't enough, that's carbon/graphene pad territory., anyone on a tight budget, this typically costs more than gelid or thermalright's options..
Compare and read more
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK) vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)
- Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 (Silver-Based/5g Syringe/Spreader Card Included) vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste (Non-Conductive/6.7 W/mK/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste (Gallium Alloy/Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU) vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)