Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m at 17 W/mK, 82% in favour of Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)

3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)

FujipolyFujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m

Specs

Show Only Differences

Specification	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
Compound Type	Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)	Silicone-Based Pad
Brand	3M	Fujipoly
Model	5590H	Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m , Ultra Extreme XR-m
Thermal Conductivity	3 W/mK-82%	17 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity	Insulating	Insulating
Package Size	Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)	100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness
Recommended Use	Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling	High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling)
Reapplication Interval	No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application	Long-term stable, not a wear item
Safety Notes	Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required	None
Paste Segment	Pad	Pad

Price comparison

Retailer	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
Amazon	View on Amazon
Newark	View on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Specs

Price comparison

More comparisons in Thermal Paste