Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

AMD Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation: Comparison

AMD Instinct MI210 and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation separate most on tdp: AMD Instinct MI210 at 300 W, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 70 W, 329% in favour of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation. Memory Bus Width splits them by another 97%, this time favouring AMD Instinct MI210.

Specs

Specification
AMD Instinct MI210
AMD Instinct MI210
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU BrandAMDNVIDIA
SeriesInstinct MI200RTX Ada Generation
Board PartnerAMD Reference (PCIe dual-slot card, data center/OEM only)PNY / NVIDIA Reference
VRAM64 GB16 GB-75%
TierDatacenter / AI AcceleratorEntry
Memory TypeHBM2EGDDR6
Boost Clock1700 MHz-20%2130 MHz
Ray Tracing Supportfalsetrue
TDP300 W-329%70 W
ArchitectureCDNA 2 (single Graphics Compute Die)Ada Lovelace
Card Length267 mm-57%170 mm
Slot Width2 (dual-slot, passive cooling for server airflow)1
Memory Bus Width4096 bit128 bit-97%
PCIe InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Display OutputsN/A - compute-only, no display output4x Mini-DisplayPort 1.4

Verdict

AMD Instinct MI210

7.3 / 10 Expert Rating

A practical, PCIe-slot-friendly way to get CDNA 2 compute into a standard server, useful for smaller HPC and AI deployments, but clearly the entry point of its generation next to the dual-die MI250X and now well behind the MI300 series.

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

6.7 / 10 Expert Rating

An efficient, VRAM-generous entry workstation card that remains a smart budget CAD or inference pick even after being succeeded by the Blackwell generation.

More comparisons in Graphics Cards