Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Predator GM7000 vs Samsung 860 QVO: Comparison
Acer Predator GM7000 and Samsung 860 QVO separate most on sequential read: Acer Predator GM7000 at 7400, Samsung 860 QVO at 550, 93% in favour of Acer Predator GM7000. Sequential Write splits them by another 92%, again favouring Acer Predator GM7000.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Acer | Samsung |
| Model Number | GM7000 | 860 QVO |
| Series | Predator GM7000 | 860 QVO |
| Sequential Read | 7400 | 550-93% |
| Sequential Write | 6700 | 520-92% |
| NAND Type | TLC with DRAM Cache | Samsung 4-bit QLC V-NAND |
| Warranty | 5 Years | 3 Years |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe | SATA III (6Gb/s) |
| Capacity Options | 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Predator GM7000 | Samsung 860 QVO |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Samsung | View on Samsung |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Samsung 860 QVO
7.3 / 10 Expert Rating
Excellent for bulk, budget SATA capacity, but QLC NAND means slower sustained writes than TLC drives.