Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, 73% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond)
Brand3MAntec
Model5590HAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-73%11 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)4g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers)
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste