Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad at 12.8 W/mK, 77% in favour of Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/12.8 W/mK)
ThermalrightThermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/12.8 W/mK)
Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-77%12.8 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)85 x 45 x 1.5mm pad
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingLaptop-Thin-GPU, Mainstream CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredHigh temperature resistant, non-conductive
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HThermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste