Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Arctic MX-6: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Arctic MX-6 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, 65% in favour of Arctic MX-6.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Carbon-Based
Brand3MArctic
Model5590HArctic MX-6 , MX-6
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-65%8.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application8+ years
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HArctic MX-6
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste