Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano at 11 W/mK, 73% in favour of Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano (Nano-Diamond Particle Based/Non-Conductive/High-End and Overclocking Compound)
Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Nano-Diamond Particle Based
Brand3MCooler Master
Model5590HCooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano , MasterGel Maker Nano
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-73%11 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1.5g / 4g tubes with flat-nozzle applicator
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingHigh-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking)
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationVerify manufacturer-rated interval
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HCooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste