Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Corsair XTM50: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Corsair XTM50 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Corsair XTM50 at 13.5 W/mK, 78% in favour of Corsair XTM50.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Corsair XTM50 (High-Performance Compound/Non-Conductive/13.5 W/mK/Applicator Included)
CorsairCorsair XTM50

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Corsair XTM50 (High-Performance Compound/Non-Conductive/13.5 W/mK/Applicator Included)
Corsair XTM50
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Metal-Oxide (zinc oxide, per Corsair)
Brand3MCorsair
Model5590HCorsair XTM50 , XTM50
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-78%13.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)5g tube with applicator
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingHigh-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationVerify manufacturer-rated interval
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HCorsair XTM50
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste