Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 at 6.0 W/mK, 50% in favour of Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 (Thermal Pad/Non-Conductive/6.0 W/mK/Laptop-GPU Pad)
Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-50%6.0 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)120 x 120 mm sheet, 2.0 mm thickness (also sold in 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thicknesses and L/XS sizes)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingLaptop-Thin-GPU (marketed for laptops, graphics cards and game consoles)
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredKeep away from small children and pets; not for internal consumption
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HDeepcool EK720-XL-2.0
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste