Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool Z10: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Deepcool Z10 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Deepcool Z10 at 6.5 W/mK, 54% in favour of Deepcool Z10.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Deepcool Z10 (Metal-Based/Ceramic Hybrid/Non-Conductive/6.5 W/mK/Cobalt-Blue Mid-Range Compound)
Deepcool Z10
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Metal-Based/Ceramic Hybrid
Brand3MDeepcool
Model5590HDeepcool Z10
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-54%6.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)5g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMid-Range CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HDeepcool Z10
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste