Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool Z5: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Deepcool Z5 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Deepcool Z5 at 1.46 W/mK, 51% in favour of 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Deepcool Z5 (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/1.46 W/mK/General-Purpose Entry Paste)
Deepcool Z5
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Metal Oxide/Ceramic
Brand3MDeepcool
Model5590HDeepcool Z5
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK1.46 W/mK-51%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)3g/7g
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingGeneral-Purpose CPU Cooling
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HDeepcool Z5
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste