Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool Z9: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Deepcool Z9 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Deepcool Z9 at 4 W/mK, 25% in favour of Deepcool Z9.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Deepcool Z9 (Silver-Oxide Compound/Non-Conductive/20% Silver Oxide Content)
Deepcool Z9
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silver-Oxide Compound (20% silver oxide)
Brand3MDeepcool
Model5590HDeepcool Z9 , Z9
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-25%4 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)3g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationVerify manufacturer-rated interval
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HDeepcool Z9
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste