Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900 at 4.8 W/mK, 38% in favour of Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
GD900 (Metal-Oxide/Non-Conductive/AliExpress Staple Grease/4.8 W/mK)
Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900
Brand3MGD (Foshan High Conductivity Electronics Co., Ltd.)
Model5590HGD900
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-37%4.8 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)5g bag up to 30g pot
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredVolume resistivity >= 1.0x10^14 ohm-cm (electrical insulator); oil separation <=1.8%
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetViscosity ~33,000 +/-5% mPa.s, cone penetration 310 +/-10 (1/10mm)
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HFoshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900
AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
GD (Manufacturer)View on GD (Manufacturer)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste