Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste differ on recommended use: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste at Marketed by Gelid for professional and extreme users.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste (Synthetic/Non-Conductive/Wide-Temp-Range Compound)
Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste
Brand3MGelid Solutions
Model5590HGC-4, TC-GC-04-A (1g), TC-GC-04-B (3.5g), TC-GC-04-C (10g)
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1g, 3.5g, and 10g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMarketed by Gelid for professional and extreme users
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNon-curing formula, marketed as "No Bleeding"
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HGelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste