Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme at 8.5 W/mK, 65% in favour of Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Gelid GC-Extreme (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Non-Corrosive/8.5 W/mK)
Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Carbon-Based
Brand3MGelid Solutions
Model5590HGelid GC-Extreme , GC-Extreme
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-65%8.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)3.5g / 10g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationVerify manufacturer-rated interval
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HGelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste