Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Halnziye HY-880: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Halnziye HY-880 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Halnziye HY-880 at 5.15 W/mK, 42% in favour of Halnziye HY-880.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Halnziye HY-880 (Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide/Non-Conductive/Multi-Pack Budget Format)
Halnziye HY-880
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide
Brand3MHalnziye
Model5590HHalnziye HY-880
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-42%5.15 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1g single-use packs (also 30g tubes)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingBudget CPU/GPU/Console/LED Cooling
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HHalnziye HY-880
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste