Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Halnziye HY-510: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Halnziye HY-510 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Halnziye HY-510 at 1.93 W/mK, 36% in favour of 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Halnziye HY-510 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/Entry-Level Budget Grease/1.93 W/mK)
Halnziye HY-510
Brand3MHalnziye
Model5590HHY-510
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK1.93 W/mK-36%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1g slim syringe up to 25g/30g tube options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetThixotropic index 380 +/-10 (1/10mm), soft spreadable grease
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HHalnziye HY-510
AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
Halnziye (Manufacturer)View on Halnziye (Manufacturer)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste