Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs JunPus JP-DX2: Comparison
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and JunPus JP-DX2 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, JunPus JP-DX2 at 17 W/mK, 82% in favour of JunPus JP-DX2.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | 3M | JunPus |
| Model | 5590H | JP-DX2 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 3 W/mK-82% | 17 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H | JunPus JP-DX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newark | View on Newark | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK-Quantum Vector³ RTX 5080/90 Thermal Pad Kit
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs CS Labs (Computer Systems, Greece) CS Labs K5-Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80