Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 71% in favour of Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum (Aluminum Nano-Particle/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Compound/10.2 W/mK)
ProlimatechProlimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum (Aluminum Nano-Particle/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Compound/10.2 W/mK)
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum
Brand3MProlimatech
Model5590HPK-2
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-71%10.2 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredDielectric strength 4 KV/mm, non-electronically conductive
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HProlimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum
AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
Prolimatech (Manufacturer)View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste