Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum at 11.2 W/mK, 73% in favour of Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)

3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum (Aluminum Nano-Particle Based/Non-Conductive/High-Grade Compound)

ProlimatechProlimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum

Specs

Show Only Differences

Specification	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum
Compound Type	Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)	Aluminum Nano-Particle
Brand	3M	Prolimatech
Model	5590H	Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum , PK-3
Thermal Conductivity	3 W/mK-73%	11.2 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity	Insulating	Insulating
Package Size	Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)	1.5g / 5g / 30g tubes
Recommended Use	Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling	Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication Interval	No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application	Verify manufacturer-rated interval
Safety Notes	Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required	None
Paste Segment	Pad	Standard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum
Amazon	View on Amazon
Newark	View on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Specs

Price comparison

More comparisons in Thermal Paste