Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Segotep GPE-01: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Segotep GPE-01 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Segotep GPE-01 at 130 W/mK, 98% in favour of Segotep GPE-01.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Segotep GPE-01 (Graphene Pad/Conductive/130 W/mK Die-Sized Pad)
Segotep GPE-01
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Graphene Pad
Brand3MSegotep
Model5590HSegotep GPE-01
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-98%130 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingConductive
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)Socket-specific die-sized pad, sold in separate AM5 and Intel-socket variants
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingHigh-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationReusable, cut-to-size solid pad
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredElectrically conductive, keep clear of exposed board components
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HSegotep GPE-01
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste