Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs SilverStone TF01: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and SilverStone TF01 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, SilverStone TF01 at 8.5 W/mK, 65% in favour of SilverStone TF01.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
SilverStone TF01 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/No Separation or Leakage/Standard Mounting Paste)
SilverStone TF01
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based
Brand3MSilverStone
Model5590HSilverStone TF01
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-65%8.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1.5g/4g tube options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingCPU/GPU Heatsink Mounting
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationMarketed as resistant to separation/leakage; no fixed interval published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HSilverStone TF01
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste