Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech SILVGREASE1: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and StarTech SILVGREASE1 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, StarTech SILVGREASE1 at 3.195 W/mK, 6% in favour of StarTech SILVGREASE1.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
StarTech SILVGREASE1 (Metal Oxide/Ceramic-Silicone/Non-Conductive/3.195 W/mK/Re-Sealable IT Syringe)
StarTech SILVGREASE1
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Metal Oxide/Ceramic-Silicone
Brand3MStarTech
Model5590HStarTech SILVGREASE1
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-6%3.195 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1.5g re-sealable syringe (also 5-pack, 20g tube)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingIT Technician/Reseller CPU-GPU Servicing
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HStarTech SILVGREASE1
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste