Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut at 8.5 W/mK, 65% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)

3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut (Metal-Oxide/Silicone Based/Non-Conductive/8.5 W/mK/Entry-Level Pick)

Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly Aeronaut

Specs

Show Only Differences

Specification	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut
Compound Type	Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)	Metal-Oxide/Silicone Based
Brand	3M	Thermal Grizzly
Model	5590H	Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut , Aeronaut
Thermal Conductivity	3 W/mK-65%	8.5 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity	Insulating	Insulating
Package Size	Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)	1g / 3.9g / 7.8g tubes
Recommended Use	Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling	Mainstream CPU/GPU (entry-level; also suited to consoles)
Reapplication Interval	No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application	Wear-resistant per brand materials; exact interval to be confirmed
Safety Notes	Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required	None
Paste Segment	Pad	Standard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut
Amazon	View on Amazon
Newark	View on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Specs

Price comparison

More comparisons in Thermal Paste