Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme at 14.2 W/mK, 79% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)

3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/14.2 W/mK/Paste-Safe Extreme OC)

Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme

Specs

Show Only Differences

Specification	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
Compound Type	Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)	Metal Oxide/Ceramic
Brand	3M	Thermal Grizzly
Model	5590H	Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
Thermal Conductivity	3 W/mK-79%	14.2 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity	Insulating	Insulating
Package Size	Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)	1g, 2g, 5.55g/9g
Recommended Use	Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling	Extreme Overclocking, High-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication Interval	No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application	Not consistently published
Safety Notes	Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required	None
Paste Segment	Pad	Standard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
Amazon	View on Amazon
Newark	View on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Specs

Price comparison

More comparisons in Thermal Paste