Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet at 40.7 W/mK, 93% in favour of Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)

3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet (Graphene Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~40.7 W/mK)

Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly KryoSheet

Specs

Show Only Differences

Specification	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
Compound Type	Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)	Graphene Pad
Brand	3M	Thermal Grizzly
Model	5590H	Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet , KryoSheet
Thermal Conductivity	3 W/mK-93%	40.7 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity	Insulating	Conductive
Package Size	Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)	24x12mm to 50x50mm sheets, 0.2mm thick
Recommended Use	Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling	High-end CPU/GPU (high-wattage GPUs especially)
Reapplication Interval	No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application	Reusable across multiple mounts
Safety Notes	Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required	Electrically conductive; keep clear of exposed board components
Paste Segment	Pad	Pad

Price comparison

Retailer	3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H	Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
Amazon	View on Amazon
Newark	View on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Specs

Price comparison

More comparisons in Thermal Paste