Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright TF4: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermalright TF4 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermalright TF4 at 9.5 W/mK, 68% in favour of Thermalright TF4.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermalright TF4 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Entry Paste/9.5 W/mK)
ThermalrightThermalright TF4

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermalright TF4 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Entry Paste/9.5 W/mK)
Thermalright TF4
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Carbon-Based
Brand3MThermalright
Model5590HThermalright TF4
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-68%9.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1.5g tube
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetGray, no metal particles
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HThermalright TF4
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste