Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermaltake TG-7: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermaltake TG-7 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermaltake TG-7 at 3.3 W/mK, 9% in favour of Thermaltake TG-7.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermaltake TG-7 (Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide/Non-Conductive/3.3 W/mK/Retail Staple)
ThermaltakeThermaltake TG-7

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermaltake TG-7 (Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide/Non-Conductive/3.3 W/mK/Retail Staple)
Thermaltake TG-7
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based/Metal Oxide
Brand3MThermaltake
Model5590HThermaltake TG-7
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-9%3.3 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)4g tube
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HThermaltake TG-7
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste