Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Akasa AK-455 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison

Akasa AK-455 and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 71% in favour of Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80.

Specs

Specification
Akasa AK-455 (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/2.4 W/mK/OEM-Popular Budget Compound)
Akasa AK-455
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/8.3 W/mK)
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Compound TypeMetal Oxide/CeramicSilicone-Based Pad
BrandAkasaParker Chomerics
ModelAkasa AK-455THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Thermal Conductivity2.4 W/mK-71%8.3 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size1.5g and 5g syringesSheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseCPU/GPU General CoolingHigh-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
Reapplication IntervalLong shelf stability before application; no in-use interval publishedNo reapplication needed; reusable silicone gap filler
Safety NotesNoneNon-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerAkasa AK-455Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
DigiKeyView on DigiKey
Sealing Devices (Datasheet)View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste