Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 71% in favour of Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Akasa | Parker Chomerics |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-71% | 8.3 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | Sheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | No reapplication needed; reusable silicone gap filler |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Akasa AK-455 | Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
|---|---|---|
| DigiKey | View on DigiKey | |
| Sealing Devices (Datasheet) | View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Akasa AK-455 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




