Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 2% in favour of Arctic MX-5.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Parker Chomerics |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.3 W/mK-2% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | Sheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | No reapplication needed; reusable silicone gap filler |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-5 | Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
|---|---|---|
| DigiKey | View on DigiKey | |
| Sealing Devices (Datasheet) | View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK