Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut: Comparison

Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut at 12.5 W/mK, 30% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/High-end CPU/GPU)
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (Silicone-Based/12.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Premium Enthusiast and Overclocking Pick)
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Compound TypeSilicone-Based PadSilicone-Based
BrandAlphacoolThermal Grizzly
ModelAlphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mKThermal Grizzly Kryonaut , Kryonaut
Thermal Conductivity17.8 W/mK12.5 W/mK-30%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet1g / 5.55g / 11.1g tubes
Recommended UseHigh-end CPU/GPUHigh-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking)
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mKThermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Alphacool Shop (EU)View on Alphacool Shop (EU)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste