Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut at 7.8 W/mK, 56% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad | Silicone-Based (silicone/metal-oxide) |
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut , Hydronaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK | 7.8 W/mK-56% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 3.9g / 7.8g tubes |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (upper-mid builds; suited to large cooling surfaces such as PS4/PS5/Xbox) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Deepcool G15
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Halnziye HY-910i




