Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 25% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/8.3 W/mK)
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
BrandAlphacoolParker Chomerics
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKTHERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK8.3 W/mK-25%
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left onSheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsHigh-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
ConsistencyManufacturer describes it as clinging closely to components similarly to a paste, and drying out more slowly than standard thermal padsSoft, compressible silicone elastomer sheet
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mKParker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
DigiKeyView on DigiKey
Sealing Devices (Datasheet)View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste