Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano at 11 W/mK, 31% in favour of Alphacool Subzero. They match on 5 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, recommended use and reapplication interval.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Nano-Diamond Particle Based |
| Brand | Alphacool | Cooler Master |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano , MasterGel Maker Nano |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 11 W/mK-31% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 1.5g / 4g tubes with flat-nozzle applicator |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Cooler Master MasterGel Maker Nano
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro