Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra at 38.4 W/mK, 58% in favour of Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Alphacool | Coollaboratory |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra , Liquid Ultra |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK-58% | 38.4 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 1g syringe with cleaning kit |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | Delidded-Direct-Die (long-term stability) |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | Liquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Subzero vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Alphacool Subzero vs Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad