Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut at 73 W/mK, 78% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Liquid Metal (Gallium-based) |
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut , Conductonaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK-78% | 73 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive (short-circuit risk) |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | Delidded-Direct-Die (experienced builders only) |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Long-lasting but requires careful reapplication |
| Safety Notes | None | Reacts with aluminum; do not use on bare aluminum coldplates or near exposed components |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Alphacool Subzero
- Alphacool Subzero vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE