Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet at 40.7 W/mK, 61% in favour of Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Graphene Pad |
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet , KryoSheet |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK-61% | 40.7 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 24x12mm to 50x50mm sheets, 0.2mm thick |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | High-end CPU/GPU (high-wattage GPUs especially) |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Reusable across multiple mounts |
| Safety Notes | None | Electrically conductive; keep clear of exposed board components |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro




