Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Zalman ZM-STG1: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Zalman ZM-STG1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Zalman ZM-STG1 at 4 W/mK, 75% in favour of Alphacool Subzero. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Alphacool | Zalman |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Zalman ZM-STG1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 4 W/mK-75% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 3.5g bottle |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | General-Purpose CPU Cooling |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Zalman ZM-STG1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Alphacool Subzero
- Alphacool Subzero vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE