Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra at 38.4 W/mK, 71% in favour of Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Antec | Coollaboratory |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra , Liquid Ultra |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-71% | 38.4 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1g syringe with cleaning kit |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Delidded-Direct-Die (long-term stability) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | Liquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK