Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK at 5 W/mK, 55% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antec | Phobya |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mk |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 5 W/mK-55% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 15 x 15 x 4mm, sold as a single piece; also available in other sizes up to 120x20mm strips |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Phobya also markets it for VRAM, VRM, and North/Southbridge cooling |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK |
|---|---|---|
| Performance-PCs | View on Performance-PCs | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme