Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum at 11.2 W/mK, 2% in favour of Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Aluminum Nano-Particle |
| Brand | Antec | Prolimatech |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum , PK-3 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-2% | 11.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1.5g / 5g / 30g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Prolimatech PK-3 Nano Aluminum
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45