Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermalright TF8: Comparison

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermalright TF8 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermalright TF8 at 13.8 W/mK, 20% in favour of Thermalright TF8. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
AntecAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Thermalright TF8 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/High-Density Filler Paste/13.8 W/mK)
ThermalrightThermalright TF8

Specs

Specification
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Thermalright TF8 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/High-Density Filler Paste/13.8 W/mK)
Thermalright TF8
BrandAntecThermalright
ModelAntec Formula 7 Nano DiamondTF8
Thermal Conductivity11 W/mK-20%13.8 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g syringe1.2g, 2g, 5.8g, 12.8g syringe options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers)High-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNoneElectrically non-conductive, harmless per manufacturer
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerAntec Formula 7 Nano DiamondThermalright TF8
Thermalright (Manufacturer)View on Thermalright (Manufacturer)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste