Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermaltake TG-30: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermaltake TG-30 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermaltake TG-30 at 4.5 W/mK, 59% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 4.5 W/mK-59% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 4.0g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-electrically conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Thermaltake TG-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermaltake TG-30
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Thermaltake TG-30