Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Zalman ZM-STC10: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Zalman ZM-STC10 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Zalman ZM-STC10 at 11.5 W/mK, 4% in favour of Zalman ZM-STC10. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antec | Zalman |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | ZM-STC10 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-4% | 11.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 2g syringe (110 x 23 x 14mm) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Zalman ZM-STC10 |
|---|---|---|
| Zalman | View on Zalman | |
| Aquatuning | View on Aquatuning |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad




