Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m at 17 W/mK, 67% in favour of Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m. They match on electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Fujipoly |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m , Ultra Extreme XR-m |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-67% | 17 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX
- Arctic MX-2 vs PCCooler EX90