Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-2 vs ID-Cooling Frost X25: Comparison

Arctic MX-2 and ID-Cooling Frost X25 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, ID-Cooling Frost X25 at 10.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of ID-Cooling Frost X25. They match on electrical conductivity, recommended use and paste segment.

Arctic MX-2 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Legacy Compound)
ArcticArctic MX-2
ID-Cooling Frost X25 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/10.5 W/mK Mainstream Paste)
ID-CoolingID-Cooling Frost X25

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-2 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Legacy Compound)
Arctic MX-2
ID-Cooling Frost X25 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/10.5 W/mK Mainstream Paste)
ID-Cooling Frost X25
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based
BrandArcticID-Cooling
ModelArctic MX-2Frost X25
Thermal Conductivity5.6 W/mK-47%10.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g, 30g, 65g2g or 4g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPUMainstream CPU/GPU
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste