Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X25: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X25 thermal conductivity compared
There is no decisive spec gap here. Thermal conductivity splits them by a margin most buyers will never feel, Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK 17.8 W/mK against ID-Cooling Frost X25 10.5 W/mK. Paste segment is not the same on both, Pad on the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK versus Standard Paste on the ID-Cooling Frost X25.
Which should you buy, Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK or ID-Cooling Frost X25?
Take the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK for high-end CPU/GPU, VRM/MOSFET, and memory-module cooling wanting the highest independently-measured W/mK figure among this catalog's pads. It also earns its place with builds needing a documented electrical safety spec sheet (volume resistance, dielectric breakdown) rather than a generic non-conductive claim. It is not the one for buyers who specifically want Eisschicht's softer, more paste-like conforming fit for delicate uneven surfaces. The ID-Cooling Frost X25 suits mainstream gaming CPUs under air or AIO coolers and ID-TG15 users wanting a documented step up, though it is the wrong buy for overclocked or high-wattage CPUs, where Frost X45 fits better and extreme overclocking or direct-die cooling. The same goes for buyers who want viscosity and density data on the spec sheet. Our rating of the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (6.8/10): A soft, high-conductivity pad aimed at high-end builds, though it lacks the independent review base of the paste side of Alphacool's lineup. Our rating of the ID-Cooling Frost X25 (7.5/10): A capable mainstream paste from ID-Cooling's well-regarded Frost line, offering most of X45's benefit at a lower price.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and ID-Cooling Frost X25 differ on compound type?
Yes. Compound Type reads Silicone-Based Pad on the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK versus Silicone-Based on the ID-Cooling Frost X25.
Is the Electrical Conductivity the same on the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and ID-Cooling Frost X25?
It is. Both are listed at Insulating, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Alphacool
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- ID-Cooling
Compound Type
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Silicone-Based Pad
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Silicone-Based
Model
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Frost X25
Thermal Conductivity
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 17.8 W/mK (ASTM D5470)Best
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- 10.5 W/mK
Electrical Conductivity
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Insulating
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Insulating
Package Size
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- 2g or 4g syringe
Recommended Use
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- High-end CPU/GPU
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Mainstream CPU/GPU
Conductivity Source
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- https://shop.alphacool.com/en/shop/thermal-conductant/thermal-pads/waem-alphacool-apex-thermal-pad-soft-18w/mk-120x20x1mm
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- https://www.idcooling.com/product/detail?id=286
Viscosity
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 0 Pa-s
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- 560 Pa-s
Min Operating Temperature
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- -50 CBest
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- -40 C
Max Operating Temperature
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 150 CBest
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- 180 C
Density
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 3.5 g/cm3
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- 2.6 g/cm3
Paste Segment
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Pad
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Standard Paste
Operating Temperature
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- -50 to +150 °CBest
- ID-Cooling Frost X25
- -40C to 180C
Which one should you pick?
Choose Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK if you want the higher thermal conductivity (17.8 W/mK (ASTM D5470) vs 10.5 W/mK).
Choose ID-Cooling Frost X25 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | ID-Cooling Frost X25 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
6.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A soft, high-conductivity pad aimed at high-end builds, though it lacks the independent review base of the paste side of Alphacool's lineup.
ID-Cooling Frost X25
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
A capable mainstream paste from ID-Cooling's well-regarded Frost line, offering most of X45's benefit at a lower price.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H2
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Honeywell PTM7950
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic TP-4