Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and ID-Cooling ID-TG15 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, ID-Cooling ID-TG15 at 8.5 W/mK, 34% in favour of ID-Cooling ID-TG15. They match on electrical conductivity, recommended use and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | ID-TG15 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-34% | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 1.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15